Federal court rules that Scott Pruitts sham EPA cant ban scientists from its scientific advisory board

Back in 2017, the new EPA Director Scott Pruitt -- a fantastically pampered shill for corporations whose income is proportional to the noxious effluvia they eject into our air, soil, and water -- passed a policy barring scientists from participating on the EPAs Scientific Advisory Board if they had ever received a grant from the EPA.

This sneaky-clever move was clearlydesigned to create the illusion that it was draining the swamp by preventing any potential conflicts of interest between scientists and money. Except that most academic scientists rely on EPA (and other) grants. Which limited the pot of scientific advisors on the scientific advisory board to scientists who worked for corporations. Who somehow didnt have any conflicts of interest between their money and their science?

It was, as the NRDC put it, a pernicious scheme to stack the deck in favor of big polluters by trying to shut out the voices of scientistsall to pump more pollution into our lives. They added:

Pruitt claimed that his 2017 directive reduced bias on the EPAs nearly two dozen advisory panels, which offer scientific expertise that then guide policy decisions on environmental pollutants, such as industrial chemicals or airborne particles from power plants. But unsurprisingly, Pruitts rule was not extended to scientists and consultants with ties to chemical or fossil fuel companies, allowing the agency to soon fill some open seats with industry insiders who disputed the known harm of pollutants, like ozone and PFOA.

Fortunately, Judge Denise Cote of the U.S. Read the rest