An Interest In:
Web News this Week
- March 28, 2024
- March 27, 2024
- March 26, 2024
- March 25, 2024
- March 24, 2024
- March 23, 2024
- March 22, 2024
Some of Our Sources
- Mashable
- Joshua Blankenship
- The Logo Smith
- Six Revisions
- My Ink Blog
- Reencoded
- Wal You
- Spyre Studios
- Web Resource Source
- TechPowerUp
Help Webnuz
Referal links:
December 19, 2012 12:37 am GMT
If you haven’t heard by now, yesterday Instagram announced an update to its Terms of Service and Privacy Policy that’s set to go into effect next month. Instagram was acquired by Facebook earlier this year for a $1 billion sale price, and the new ToS is ostensibly meant to make the photo-sharing app integrate better with the social networking giant. The most notable thing about the new terms is that Instagram will reserve the right to sell its users’ photos to companies that want to use them in advertisements — without needing users’ knowledge or consent, or of course, giving them a share of the money. If this sounds like a bum deal to you, you’re in good company. It looks like even Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s sister isn’t so keen on the changes. Today, Arielle Zuckerberg publicly “liked” an Instagram photo from a user named Clayton Cubitt that’s essentially a screenshot of the most controversial bit of the new Instagram ToS with the caption, “Instagram’s suicide note.” The gesture did not go unnoticed by Cubitt — he went on to post a screenshot of Zuckerberg’s “like” along with the caption, “I’m sure Mark Zuckerberg isn’t too happy with me today, but his sister was very nice.” (Actually, Clayton, Zuck’s a very busy man and I’d put my money on you not necessarily pinging on his radar of concerns… but who knows.) Now, it of course bears mention that Arielle Zuckerberg is a private citizen and does not speak for Facebook at all. She’s actually an employee at Google in the Wildfire Interactive division. But as someone who has made tech industry headlines several times before — and has more than 14,000 public subscribers to her Facebook updates — taking a stance publicly on this (her ‘like’ shows up to anyone who is signed in to Facebook, not just her friends or subscribers) is interesting. And her not retracting it even after having it noticed and called out is, I think, newsworthy — or blog-worthy, at the very least. It’s indicative of just how divisive these new Instagram terms are. Indeed, the backlash may just be beginning. CNN anchor Anderson Cooper seems to have just gotten wind of the news this morning and is apparently also displeased. He tweeted to his 3.4 million followers asking if they can recommend a different photo-sharing app: #Instagram will now be able to use
Original Link: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/uMgllk8Brq4/
The Backlash Continues: Zucks Sis Doesnt Seem To Like The Instagram Changes Either
If you haven’t heard by now, yesterday Instagram announced an update to its Terms of Service and Privacy Policy that’s set to go into effect next month. Instagram was acquired by Facebook earlier this year for a $1 billion sale price, and the new ToS is ostensibly meant to make the photo-sharing app integrate better with the social networking giant. The most notable thing about the new terms is that Instagram will reserve the right to sell its users’ photos to companies that want to use them in advertisements — without needing users’ knowledge or consent, or of course, giving them a share of the money. If this sounds like a bum deal to you, you’re in good company. It looks like even Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s sister isn’t so keen on the changes. Today, Arielle Zuckerberg publicly “liked” an Instagram photo from a user named Clayton Cubitt that’s essentially a screenshot of the most controversial bit of the new Instagram ToS with the caption, “Instagram’s suicide note.” The gesture did not go unnoticed by Cubitt — he went on to post a screenshot of Zuckerberg’s “like” along with the caption, “I’m sure Mark Zuckerberg isn’t too happy with me today, but his sister was very nice.” (Actually, Clayton, Zuck’s a very busy man and I’d put my money on you not necessarily pinging on his radar of concerns… but who knows.) Now, it of course bears mention that Arielle Zuckerberg is a private citizen and does not speak for Facebook at all. She’s actually an employee at Google in the Wildfire Interactive division. But as someone who has made tech industry headlines several times before — and has more than 14,000 public subscribers to her Facebook updates — taking a stance publicly on this (her ‘like’ shows up to anyone who is signed in to Facebook, not just her friends or subscribers) is interesting. And her not retracting it even after having it noticed and called out is, I think, newsworthy — or blog-worthy, at the very least. It’s indicative of just how divisive these new Instagram terms are. Indeed, the backlash may just be beginning. CNN anchor Anderson Cooper seems to have just gotten wind of the news this morning and is apparently also displeased. He tweeted to his 3.4 million followers asking if they can recommend a different photo-sharing app: #Instagram will now be able to useOriginal Link: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/uMgllk8Brq4/
Share this article:
Tweet
View Full Article
Techcrunch
TechCrunch is a leading technology blog, dedicated to obsessively profiling startups, reviewing new Internet products, and breaking tech news.More About this Source Visit Techcrunch