With state secrets privilege, U.S. ends challenge by journalist over drone kill list

A U.S. judge today dismissed a lawsuit by an American journalist who sought to challenge his placement on a drone kill list by U.S. authorities in Syria.

DC federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by a US citizen journalist who believes he may be on the US govt's "Kill List" (as a terrorist approved for targeting in Syria) the judge dismissed it based on the govt invoking the state secrets privilege https://t.co/jkd3vPOnjd pic.twitter.com/OSOPdxQYdW

— Zoe Tillman (@ZoeTillman) September 24, 2019

In fighting Bilal Abdul Kareem's lawsuit, the Trump administration successfully invoked the state secrets privilege to withhold sensitive national security information.

In her 14-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer of Washington, D.C. said she was bound to agree with the government, and said its right to withhold information in such instances is absolute.

What constitutional right is more essential than the right to due process before the government may take a life? While the answer may be none, federal courts possess limited authority to resolve questions presented in a lawsuit, even when they are alleged to involve constitutional rights. This is such a case, Collyer wrote.

Despite the serious nature of Plaintiffs allegations, this Court must dismiss the action pursuant to the governments invocation of the state secrets privilege.

From Spencer S. Hsu at the Washington Post:

[Judge Collyer] last year had opened the way for Bilal Abdul Kareem, a freelance journalist who grew up in New York, to seek answers in his civil case from the government and to try to clear his name after what he claims were five near-misses by U.S.