Some of Our Sources
- Engadget
- Simplebits
- Smashing Apps
- You The Designer
- FanExtra - PSD
- Web Design Ledger
- Specky Boy
- Web Resource Source
- Android Headlines
- Willems Lab
Help Webnuz
Referal links:
December 9, 2015 10:00 pm
Original Link: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/EaM0_EU7WNE/5-raspberry-pi-zero-compared-to-intels-netburst-cpus-newer
$5 Raspberry Pi Zero Compared To Intel's NetBurst CPUs & Newer
An anonymous reader writes: Curious about the performance of a Raspberry Pi Zero, Phoronix has published a number of Raspberry Pi 2 + Pi Zero performance benchmarks with paired power consumption data. They found the Pi Zero performed slower than even an Intel Celeron 320 from the NetBurst era, but that the Raspberry Pi 2 was performing between that Celeron and a Pentium 4 "C" 2.8GHz CPU from 2004. While the Raspberry Pis didn't win in raw performance, the performance-per-Watt of the Raspberry Pi 2 was 220x greater than the Pentium Northwood. The Pi Zero had an average power consumption of 2.7 Watts and the Raspberry Pi 2 was at 3.5 Watts; however, compared to newer Broadwell and Skylake processors, Intel's low-end parts delivered greater power efficiency while the Raspberry Pi had the best value.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Original Link: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/EaM0_EU7WNE/5-raspberry-pi-zero-compared-to-intels-netburst-cpus-newer
Share this article:
Tweet
View Full Article
Slashdot
Slashdot was originally created in September of 1997 by Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda. Today it is owned by Geeknet, Inc..More About this Source Visit Slashdot