NYT: NSA moniters, graphs some US Citizens' social activity with collected metadata

Just how does the NSA piece together all that metadata it collects? Thanks to "newly disclosed documents and interviews with officials," the New York Times today shed light on how it plots out the social activity and connections of those it's spying on. Up until 2010, it only traced and analyzed the metadata of emails and phone calls from foreigners, but anything from US Citizens in the chains would create stopgaps. Snowden-provided documents note the NSA shifted its policy around late in that year to allow itself to include Americans' metadata in analysis. An NSA representative explained to the Times that, "all data queries must include a foreign intelligence justification, period."

During "large-scale graph analysis," collected metadata is cross-referenced with commercial, public and "enrichment data" (some examples included GPS locations, social media accounts and banking info) to create a contact chain tied to any foreigner under review and scope out its activity. One of the of the main set of ingestion tools goes by the name Mainway. The Times also highlights a secret report, dubbed "Better Person Centric Analysis" as well, that bunches the data into 164 searchable "relationship types" and 94 "entity types" (email and IP addresses, along with phone numbers). Other documents highlight that during 2011 it took in over 700 million phone records daily on its own, along with an "unnamed American service provider " that began funneling in an additional 1.1 billion cellphone records that August. In addition to that, Snowden's leak of the NSA's classified 2013 budget cites it as hoping to capture "20 billion 'record events' daily" that would be available for review by the agency's analysts in an hour's time. As you might expect, the number US Citizens' that've had their info been bunched up into all of this currently remains a secret -- national security, of course. Extended details are available at the source links.

Filed under: Misc, Internet

Comments

Via: The Verge

Source: New York Times