An Interest In:
Web News this Week
- April 16, 2024
- April 15, 2024
- April 14, 2024
- April 13, 2024
- April 12, 2024
- April 11, 2024
- April 10, 2024
Some of Our Sources
- Simplebits
- Pearsonified
- The Logo Smith
- Naldz Graphics
- Fudge Graphics
- Line 25
- 24 Ways
- Design Modo
- Codrops
- Daily Now
Help Webnuz
Referal links:
August 1, 2013 10:56 pm GMT
I’m not a fan of the National Security Agency’s secret dragnet program, but I’m honest enough to admit that I hold a minority view. Recently, a string of stories have wrongly implied that the public has become more privacy-happy in response to the scandal surrounding the leak of the NSA’s telephone and Internet metadata surveillance program. So, to test whether public opinion had actually changed over the last month, we ran our own national opinion surveys and found that, like last fall, about 56 percent of Americans approve of the government collecting their data to investigate terrorism. Perhaps more importantly, Americans think the government is collecting the actual content of email and phone calls, and approval of the program slightly increased in the last month. In future surveys, I’m hopeful that public opinion will, at the very least, support more transparency in mass surveillance programs, but, in the meantime, let’s explore the facts as they are. Little Shift In Public Opinion Since January 2006, about twice as many Americans have consistently thought it more important to “Investigate terrorist threats” than to “Not intrude on privacy”. The last column in the graph is our own Google Survey CrunchGov Poll. You can view the methodology and wording here. Our results show about a 4 percent dip from Pew from last month, but it’s almost within the margin of error (2 percent) and it’s slightly different wording, so it’s doubtful there’s much of a change, if any, in public opinion. Fortunately, Google Survey also gives us an idea of why people answer the way they do. A few responses: –”protect me within the rules of the law” –”investigating terrorist threats at the sake of privacy is fine as long as the information isn’t used for any other purpose and the focus is on terrorism and not anything else” About the NSA specifically, a slight majority (54 percent) favored the current dragnet program. Some of the justifications: –”acceptable for the investigation of terrorist but evidence cannot be used for anything else” –”acceptable if done by keywords” –”i’m not as upset at that invasion of privacy as the irs” Privacy-advocates may not like the way Pew framed the questions, but I think they’re fair. It explicit asked if it’s ok to track millions of Americans’ phone records. In fact, I thought Pews wording wastoo negative against the NSA. A more balanced framing would have qualified
Original Link: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/HyNCMV-5rX0/
A Majority Of The Public Still Approves Of NSA Dragnet, 4 Graphs
I’m not a fan of the National Security Agency’s secret dragnet program, but I’m honest enough to admit that I hold a minority view. Recently, a string of stories have wrongly implied that the public has become more privacy-happy in response to the scandal surrounding the leak of the NSA’s telephone and Internet metadata surveillance program. So, to test whether public opinion had actually changed over the last month, we ran our own national opinion surveys and found that, like last fall, about 56 percent of Americans approve of the government collecting their data to investigate terrorism. Perhaps more importantly, Americans think the government is collecting the actual content of email and phone calls, and approval of the program slightly increased in the last month. In future surveys, I’m hopeful that public opinion will, at the very least, support more transparency in mass surveillance programs, but, in the meantime, let’s explore the facts as they are. Little Shift In Public Opinion Since January 2006, about twice as many Americans have consistently thought it more important to “Investigate terrorist threats” than to “Not intrude on privacy”. The last column in the graph is our own Google Survey CrunchGov Poll. You can view the methodology and wording here. Our results show about a 4 percent dip from Pew from last month, but it’s almost within the margin of error (2 percent) and it’s slightly different wording, so it’s doubtful there’s much of a change, if any, in public opinion. Fortunately, Google Survey also gives us an idea of why people answer the way they do. A few responses: –”protect me within the rules of the law” –”investigating terrorist threats at the sake of privacy is fine as long as the information isn’t used for any other purpose and the focus is on terrorism and not anything else” About the NSA specifically, a slight majority (54 percent) favored the current dragnet program. Some of the justifications: –”acceptable for the investigation of terrorist but evidence cannot be used for anything else” –”acceptable if done by keywords” –”i’m not as upset at that invasion of privacy as the irs” Privacy-advocates may not like the way Pew framed the questions, but I think they’re fair. It explicit asked if it’s ok to track millions of Americans’ phone records. In fact, I thought Pews wording wastoo negative against the NSA. A more balanced framing would have qualifiedOriginal Link: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/HyNCMV-5rX0/
Share this article:
Tweet
View Full Article
Techcrunch
TechCrunch is a leading technology blog, dedicated to obsessively profiling startups, reviewing new Internet products, and breaking tech news.More About this Source Visit Techcrunch