An Interest In:
Web News this Week
- March 28, 2024
- March 27, 2024
- March 26, 2024
- March 25, 2024
- March 24, 2024
- March 23, 2024
- March 22, 2024
Some of Our Sources
- Mashable
- Web Designer Wall
- Smashing Magazine
- Vandelay Design
- Web Designer Depot
- Stylized Web
- Freelance Switch
- Design Modo
- Android Dissected
- Android Headlines
Help Webnuz
Referal links:
June 12, 2013 12:26 am GMT
[Update: Someone from Google has responded to us (by tweet!) We'll update this post as we get more questions answered] Google made headlines today for a letter to the federal government requesting the right to release more information on compliance with spy orders. The letter claims that if the public knew how many requests for data the National Security Agency demanded, they woulddispelrumors that it’s giving away sweeping access to federal spies. “We therefore ask you to help make it possible for Google to publish in our Transparency Report aggregate numbers of national security requests, including FISA disclosuresin terms of both the number we receive and their scope. Googles numbers would clearly show that our compliance with these requests falls far short of the claims being made. Google has nothing to hide,” wrote Chief Legal Officer, David Drummond. I’m calling BS. Google’s transparency reports only disclose the number of requests made of each service. In understanding FISA orders, it’s important to realize that it’s possible for one court order to gather troves of data. “FISA orders can range from inquiries about specific people to a broad sweep for intelligence, like logs of certain search terms, lawyers who work with the orders said,” explainedThe New York Times. As a case in point, the leaked court order to allow the government to collect phone records of all U.S. Verizon calls could have been a single, solitary FISA request. “It’s not necessarily the case that disclosing raw numbers will be helpful, but it depends on the type of order they receive,” explains Mark Rumold of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, “In the business records context (the Verizon order), the government disclosed raw numbers, but that didn’t provide meaningful information because they were using a single order to obtain records on millions.” The good folks at the EFF are right in that any step towards more transparency is helpful. As the EFF reminds me, Google has been a laudable industry pioneer in disclosing censorship requests, and helping to bring public attention to America’s growing spying apparatus. But this latest letter doesn’t give us any indication that disclosing the number of requests would help. We reached out to Google and have yet to receive a response. Google responded to us, saying that they would like to include the number of users affected, as they currently do on the transparency reports.”We know that sometimes a single government
Original Link: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/HzYwJaw3Ipk/
Why Google's Request To Release More Spying Data Would Be *Uninformative [Updated]
[Update: Someone from Google has responded to us (by tweet!) We'll update this post as we get more questions answered] Google made headlines today for a letter to the federal government requesting the right to release more information on compliance with spy orders. The letter claims that if the public knew how many requests for data the National Security Agency demanded, they woulddispelrumors that it’s giving away sweeping access to federal spies. “We therefore ask you to help make it possible for Google to publish in our Transparency Report aggregate numbers of national security requests, including FISA disclosuresin terms of both the number we receive and their scope. Googles numbers would clearly show that our compliance with these requests falls far short of the claims being made. Google has nothing to hide,” wrote Chief Legal Officer, David Drummond. I’m calling BS. Google’s transparency reports only disclose the number of requests made of each service. In understanding FISA orders, it’s important to realize that it’s possible for one court order to gather troves of data. “FISA orders can range from inquiries about specific people to a broad sweep for intelligence, like logs of certain search terms, lawyers who work with the orders said,” explainedThe New York Times. As a case in point, the leaked court order to allow the government to collect phone records of all U.S. Verizon calls could have been a single, solitary FISA request. “It’s not necessarily the case that disclosing raw numbers will be helpful, but it depends on the type of order they receive,” explains Mark Rumold of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, “In the business records context (the Verizon order), the government disclosed raw numbers, but that didn’t provide meaningful information because they were using a single order to obtain records on millions.” The good folks at the EFF are right in that any step towards more transparency is helpful. As the EFF reminds me, Google has been a laudable industry pioneer in disclosing censorship requests, and helping to bring public attention to America’s growing spying apparatus. But this latest letter doesn’t give us any indication that disclosing the number of requests would help. We reached out to Google and have yet to receive a response. Google responded to us, saying that they would like to include the number of users affected, as they currently do on the transparency reports.”We know that sometimes a single governmentOriginal Link: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/HzYwJaw3Ipk/
Share this article:
Tweet
View Full Article
Techcrunch
TechCrunch is a leading technology blog, dedicated to obsessively profiling startups, reviewing new Internet products, and breaking tech news.More About this Source Visit Techcrunch