Your Web News in One Place

Help Webnuz

Referal links:

Sign up for GreenGeeks web hosting
June 6, 2013 08:07 pm GMT

On Spying, A Deficit Of Trust

flicker-user-aussiegallAfter it was revealed that the National Security Administration was collecting phone records of every single U.S. call on the Verizon network, even President Obama’s most ardent supporters are losing faith that he would usher in a more transparent government. Loyal Democrat, former Vice President and Internet inventor, Al Gore called the NSA’s massive spying program”obscenely outrageous”. Americans have always accepted the necessary evil of secrecy to protect citizens, but a disturbing trend in politically motivated security scandals has eroded the trust that justifies secrecy in the democracy. As a result, there hasn’t been enough public support for Congress to update our badly antiquated cybersecurity laws. Secrecy is not an unlimited free pass for wonton privacy invasion: the government has to prove, at least somewhat regularly, that the good outweighs the bad.Unfortunately, we have been presented with little evidence that massive spying operations are producing the intended effects. Last year, in a rare freak-everyone-out Wall Street Journal OpEd in support of improved cybersecurity legislation, President Obama resorted to an imaginary example to prove his point. Last month I convened an emergency meeting of my cabinet and top homeland security, intelligence and defense officialsUnknown hackers, perhaps a world away, had inserted malicious software into the computer networks of private-sector companies that operate most of our transportation, water and other critical infrastructure systems. Fortunately, last months scenario was just a simulation, he wrote. Yet, there appears to be more evidence that the harm to a free media has been greater than the alleged benefits of intrusion. There has been a baffling level of secrecy around the trail of Wikileaks source, Bradley Manning‘s trial: most journalists have been denied access to the proceedings, there’s no transcript, and even the judge’s name was redacted in one government report. “I can’t think of a reason for it,” says Eugene Fidell, an expert in military legal history at Yale Law School. Fidell tells me he doesn’t suspectmaliciousintent, but does think the military brass involved don’t understand the value of public opinion or the need for reporters to do their job. “It is utterly inimical to daily journalism.” Nor is that the only case: after it was revealed the AP had been wiretapped for weeks to uncover who had leaked information about a foiled Al-Qaeda bomb plot, President Obama issued new orders to protect journalists, saying he was “troubled by the possibility that leak investigations may chill

Original Link: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/LndlcMUobXc/

Share this article:    Share on Facebook
View Full Article

Techcrunch

TechCrunch is a leading technology blog, dedicated to obsessively profiling startups, reviewing new Internet products, and breaking tech news.

More About this Source Visit Techcrunch